I dedicate this long-ass post to Megan, who asked for it and promised to comment, even if the comment is just “Noodles.”
Spoiler warning for the first two episodes of Lost, Season 5, from here on out.
Ultimately I was left underwhelmed with both episodes of Lost yesterday. That’s not to say that I didn’t enjoy them—but the “high” just never happened for me like it has for most episodes in the past, and I suspect it has something to do with the mysteries starting to wind down.
It started out strong. I was smiling with anticipation as the mysterious person got out of bed and it turned out to be Dr. Pierre Chang, aka Marvin Candle, aka Edgar Halliwax, aka Mark Wickmund, aka “the guy from the orientation videos.” It was cool to see that the frozen donkey wheel—the thing under the Orchid station that Ben turned to move the island—was there before Dharma got even got to the island. I think it’s safe to say that the wheel and the four toed statue are connected somehow… likely some kind of ancient civilization, and so the mystery still remains… who built them, how, are they still around and if so how do they feel about Dharma poking around at their shit?
On a side note, I think it’s also safe to say that the “incident” that Dr. Candle spoke about while clutching his artificial arm way back in one of the first orientation videos was some kind of release of this ‘dark energy’ that he is scared to drill into.
Anyway, the climax to this scene was of course the revelation that Dr. Daniel Faraday was there, that he was among the construction crew working for Dharma in the construction of the Orchid station. However, the look on his face made it clear to me that he was there as a spy from the future and not just a “young Faraday”—a theory supported by everything that happened regarding time travel from there on out.
So. Speaking of time travel…
Being a huge sci-fi fan, I love the concept of time travel with one huge caveat: it has to make at least some kind of sense. And, truth be told, it’s not that hard for it to make sense. I can even accept paradoxes, such as Skynet going back in time to create itself. I accept things like that because I feel like limiting time and space to what our puny little human senses can accept is a pretty egotistical thing for us to do. We experience time as linear but that doesn’t mean that it is. We only see a certain spectrum of light but that doesn’t mean things like ultraviolet doesn’t exist.
Anyway, what I mean to say is that I don’t have a problem with time travel itself, but it has to make sense in relation to the story being told. Terminator is a great time travel story. Back To The Future, while entertaining, is a great time travel story (though not actually rooted in much science). Battlestar Galactica would not be a good time travel story, because it just doesn’t lend itself to the story. I guess my mind is still undecided as to whether or not I like it having such a prominent role on Lost.
I do, however, like how they’ve set the rules so far. We know from seasons 3 and 4 that “the universe has a way of course correcting…” that is to say that everything that can happen has already been decided: the major turning points in your life and the universe as a whole have already fallen into place, and it doesn’t really matter how they happen, just that they do… and you can’t change it. Sarah Connor’s mantra “no fate but what we make” doesn’t apply here because you simply cannot change the past.
It is summed up nicely by Daniel: “picture time like a street. You can go forward and backward, but you can never make a new street.” Easy enough. When you start introducing tangents and alternate timelines, things can get mucked up pretty easy.
I like this rule of “one street” because it’s what makes the most sense to me. Think of time more like space. In space, we exist on planet Earth and it’s what we know. We have not yet been to Mars, or Alpha Centauri. But we know they exist. Now think of time similar to that. We exist here in 2009. We have not yet been to 2015 or 2999, but we know they exist. So when you “go back in time” or “go to the future” with the intent to change something, you’re giving yourself way too much credit. Everything that has ever happened and can already happen is already as concrete as the galaxy around us, and your puny little human self can’t do anything about it beyond moving tiny little insignificant pieces of sand that don’t matter much to the bigger picture.
This doesn’t sit well with people who are all about free-will, but whatever. Like I said, it’s what makes the most sense to me and I’m glad it’s how Lost appears to be approaching things, too.
One thing that concerns me, though, is exactly what can travel through time. Terminator is flawed in this respect, but I hold Lost to a higher standard because it’s been so real up to this point. What I mean is, why do things like Daniel’s backpack, their clothes, Locke’s knife, and the raft travel through time with them, but their tents don’t? Juliet’s line about “things that were with us are taken along” doesn’t make much sense. What constitutes something being “with them?” How was the raft “with them” more so than the tents and food in their camp?
This concerns me because I fear that it won’t be explained. It may seem like a minor detail but it really is the difference between a believable yet fat-fetched idea and something totally ridiculous. Like Superman’s costume. Why is it that his cape is never torn, or his costume doesn’t burn off when he runs into burning buildings? They explain it by saying his “Kryptonian essence” bubbles out to encompass things within a certain distance from his skin. I suppose I could accept a similar logic with Lost’s idea of time travel, and that would explain their clothes and their notebooks and backpacks, but it still doesn’t explain why the raft was taken with them and not, say, each grain of sand under their feet.
Still, it was damn cool to see Yemi’s plane crash in person. I wonder what else we’ll see, and if we’ll eventually run into the season one versions of the castaways.
This leads to an interesting idea, too. If the time-shifting castaways encounter their previous selves, perhaps those are the mysterious “whispers” that have yet to be explained. Two possibilities here: 1) either the time-shifting castaways are keeping their voices low so as to not disturb their past-selves, or 2) perhaps the time-shifted people can’t be seen by older versions of themselves, so back in season one the whispers were just their season four selves traveling down Time Street.
I think I like Possibility #2 better, but it runs into snags when you consider how Daniel spoke to past-Desmond, and of course there’s that Marvin Candle video where he freaks out when Bunny #8 appears and threatens to touch the other Bunny #8. “Don’t let them touch each other!” he exclaims, as if doing so would result in some kind of cataclysmic… incident. If possibility #2 were true, that couldn’t have happened.
Also: I’m confident we’ll run into Rousseau again, and that’s awesome because I’m still upset that she died. I’ve been waiting to hear her entire story since Day 1, and the thought that we might experience it in “real time” is even more intriguing.
And even more intriguing than that, is the idea that’s been knocking around in my head since early on… that “Adam & Eve” are people that we know.

At first I thought that somehow Jack and Kate would skip around the timeline and end up being the corpses discovered in Season One. Now I’m thinking it may be Sawyer and Juliet, Faraday and Charlotte, or, more likely… Desmond and Penny. Regardless, I am 88.15% certain it’s a couple we’ve already met, or at least know about. Consequently, they may be part of the ancient civilization that created the Donkey Wheel and Four Toed Statue.
So, as it does with every season, the show has taken on a much bigger scope. “Lost (on an island)” has now given way to “Lost (in Time),” which is what it appears to have been about since the beginning.
So I guess my sense of being left “underwhelmed” is just a desire to have these things explained confidently, because once they are then I can get back into enjoying the show. As of right now my belief has to be too far suspended to really get into the story as much as I’d like.
I also think it has a lot to do with the Oceanic 6/Ben storyline. I’m just not engaged in that. I wanted to stay on the island, not skip around the real world with Ben constantly repeating the importance of going back to the island. I GET IT. Ben has gone from legitimately scary, to slightly threatening, to, at times, legitimately annoying. For some reason, that whole drama just isn’t doing it for me, but I fear it’s what we’ll be seeing for the remainder of the season.
Anyway, it’s good to have Lost to look forward to again on a weekly basis. I’m not sure I can do a blog like this every week but I’m always flattered when people tell me I should.
Also, a senseless yet fairly obvious prediction: Ms. Hawking (the white haired hooded woman who is presumably finding the island for Ben) is Daniel’s mom.